kyle rittenhouse
Kyle Rittenhouse and defense attorney Mark Richards stand as Judge Bruce Schroeder makes a personal call during Rittenhouse's trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wis., on Friday, Nov. 12, 2021. Rittenhouse is accused of killing two people and wounding a third during a protest over police brutality in Kenosha, last year. (Mark Hertzberg /Pool Photo via AP)
Listen to this article here
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

While addressing the jury before closing arguments began Monday morning, Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed count six of the indictment against Kyle Rittenhouse. Count six was a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

The charge was punishable by up to nine months in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Judge Schroeder said the Wisconsin law was poorly written and that the shorter barrel size of the rifle Rittenhouse carried meant he didn’t violate that law. 

“No longer part of your consideration”

Rittenhouse still faces five felony charges from the events of August 25, 2020. If the jury convicts him of the most serious charge against him, he faces a mandatory sentence of life in prison. Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty to all five charges.

Judge Schroeder has begun reading instructions to the jury ahead of closing arguments from the prosecution and defense. 

The judge and attorneys estimate the reading of the instructions will take about an hour,  with 36 pages of jury instructions.

Mike Creef is a fighter for equality and justice for all. Growing up bi-racial (Jamaican-American) on the east coast allowed him to experience many different cultures and beliefs that helped give him a...

One reply on “Judge in Kyle Rittenhouse trial dismisses gun charge before closing arguments begin”

  1. The judge is pushing for a full acquittal. No partial conviction can be allowed. He’s obviously guilty of the gun charge so the best strategy is to rule that the law is “poorly written”. Huh? and the barrel is too short? Sawed off barrels are a crime everywhere. No he didn’t want the jury to be able to settle on any conviction.

Comments are closed.